Skip to content Skip to navigation

Out of Context: The Uses of Modernist Fiction

About the Author

Michaela Bronstein

Michaela Bronstein studies the history of the novel, focusing on the experience of reading---both the intimate temporality of the span of time a reader spends immersed in a particular novel, and the longer history of the way books get picked up and repurposed across temporal and national boundaries. Her teaching and research interests range across 20th-century narrative: from text to television, from Anglo-American modernism to contemporary African fiction. Her first book, Out of Context: The Uses of Modernist Fiction, came out from Oxford University Press. It examines the transhistorical uses of modernist literary forms: rather than looking for the political significance of...

Oxford University Press

How do novels travel through time? How might they endure in a changing world and reach the readers of an unknowable future? Modernist writers were eager to think of their books as reaching audiences they could not yet imagine. In recent years however, scholars of modernism have focused on pinning them down: putting these books in their context and these authors in their place. By looking to the future, scholars fear that looking to the future will make literature disengaged, irresponsible, or apolitical; the worry is that literature cannot escape its own moment without also evading the hard truths of history.

Out of Context suggests an alternative to this scholarship, proposing that literature travels through time not by transcending history, but by adapting to historical change. The chapters of this book each pair a modernist author with a later reader. In each case, this future reader is also a novelist--someone who reads with an eye to form and craft, and who puts what they see to new use in their own novels. James Baldwin adapts Henry James's modes of characterization; Ngugi wa Thiong'o repurposes Joseph Conrad's nonchronological narratives; and Ken Kesey builds on William Faulkner's use of multiple perspectives. 

Reading the modernists through these authors' eyes offers a different perspective on them. Literary forms, in this history, do not have intrinsic political meanings; they have a multitude of political uses. Rather than see modernist literary form, in all its fragmentation and complexity, as a source of disruption and doubt, these later authors use modernist forms to distill doubts into conviction. The experiments of modernist fiction stand revealed as tools not of political critique but of political commitment.